Share this photo on Twitter Share this photo on Facebook

To look, or not to look: That is the question

Posted by
MAU (Zarzalejo, Spain) on 30 December 2010 in People & Portrait.

Both my dog and myself think that yes, that one has to look and take the shot. And, if possible, with a better focus/sharpness than this one.

NIKON D200 1/160 second F/5.6 ISO 200 255 mm (35mm equiv.)

My galleries:

And my father's photos:

pax from Mahon, Spain

Claramente tu has mirado....oich! ahora yo tambien!

30 Dec 2010 12:22pm

@pax: Bien hecho pax. ¡Feliz 2011¡

Philou04 from Manosque, France

Nice shot, good compo and framing.
My answer to your question is : I look !

30 Dec 2010 12:54pm

@Philou04: Thank you Philou, and glad to see that I am not the only one looking :-) Happy 2011!

Franz from Baden, Austria

definitely "to look"! great compo and light, very appealing atmosphere!

30 Dec 2010 1:32pm

@Franz: Thank you Franz. Happy 2011!

Reed from St. Louis, Missouri, United States

No doubt - look! I mean, you'd have to be dead not to...

As for the sharpness - you have a good excuse - you were distracted!

30 Dec 2010 3:17pm

@Reed: Thank you Reed. Glad to see there is a worldwide agreement :-) Happy 2011!

alex centrella from California, United States

nice catch ...

30 Dec 2010 3:55pm

@alex centrella: Thank Alex. Happy 2011!

Curly from South Shields, United Kingdom

I prefer to look from the front, and try to entice a smile and a glint in the eye.
Keep looking and shooting!

30 Dec 2010 5:47pm

@Curly: Of course, and I do too. But they were walking away from me. Happy 2011!

1/160 second
ISO 200
255 mm (35mm equiv.)